 |
IMG BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic at 3000 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-06-2023
Detailed comparison data of IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, Neocore, GFXBench, Quadrant, PCMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in GTA, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Madout2, PUBG, Minecraft etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy IMG BXM-8-256 or Apple A14 Bionic.
IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 4 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 594446 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 20131 | | | | | GFloPS | 256 GFloPS | 1480 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 640 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 16 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz is better: 4
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
