 |
Mali-G57 MC2 at 950 MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic at 3000 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 24-01-2021
Maximum benchmark examination data of Mali-G57 MC2 @ 950MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz, which GPU is better. Full comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like GFXBench, 3DMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, PassMark, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Neocore, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, GTA, Madout2, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Call of Duty etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Mali-G57 MC2 or Apple A14 Bionic.
Mali-G57 MC2 @ 950MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G57 MC2 @ 950MHz |
Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz |
| Frequency | 950 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 2 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 16 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 308465 | 594446 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 20131 | | | | | GFloPS | 486 GFloPS | 1480 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 368 MT/s | 640 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 6.1 GP/s | 16 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G57 MC2 @ 950MHz is better: 0
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz is better: 9
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
