 |
IMG BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Mali-G57 MP4 at 600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-06-2023
Comprehensive comparison data of IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Quadrant, 3DMark, GFXBench, PCMark, PassMark, Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of GPUs in GTA, Call of Duty, Fortnite, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Minecraft etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy IMG BXM-8-256 or Mali-G57 MP4.
IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 600 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 4 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 346612 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 8203 | | | | | GFloPS | 256 GFloPS | 498 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 386 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 6.4 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 9
The number of parameters for which Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz is better: 1
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
