 |
Mali-G715 MP9 at 750 MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic at 3000 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 30-10-2022
Extreme benchmark testing data of Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz, which GPU is better. Full compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as Vellamo, PCMark, 3DMark, Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, PassMark, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, and how good the GPU are in games Asphalt 9, GTA, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Fortnite, Madout2, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Mali-G715 MP9 or Apple A14 Bionic.
Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz |
Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz |
| Frequency | 750 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 9 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 797642 | 594446 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 22356 | 20131 | | | | | GFloPS | 1354.62 GFloPS | 1480 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 3055 MT/s | 640 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 106.15 GP/s | 16 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
