 |
Mali-G68 MP5 at 950 MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic at 3000 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 08-03-2023
Comprehensive comparison data of Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Neocore, GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, PassMark, Vellamo, PCMark, 3DMark, and how good the GPU are in games Call of Duty, Fortnite, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, PUBG, GTA, Madout2 etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Mali-G68 MP5 or Apple A14 Bionic.
Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz |
Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz |
| Frequency | 950 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 610701 | 594446 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 20131 | | | | | GFloPS | 1026 GFloPS | 1480 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 304 MT/s | 640 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 148 GP/s | 16 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz is better: 5
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
