 |
IMG BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Adreno 642L at 550 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-06-2023
Ultimate benchmark examination data of IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Adreno 642L @ 550MHz, which GPU is better. Full compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, Quadrant, PassMark, Neocore, 3DMark, and how good the GPU are in games Fortnite, GTA, Minecraft, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy IMG BXM-8-256 or Adreno 642L.
IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Adreno 642L @ 550MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Adreno 642L @ 550MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 550 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 0 | | Shaders | 256 | 512 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 6 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 507648 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 16978 | | | | | GFloPS | 256 GFloPS | 906.58 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 391 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 10.63 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Adreno 642L @ 550MHz is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
