 |
IMG BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 at 900 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-06-2023
Comprehensive comparison data of IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, GFXBench, PCMark, 3DMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, PUBG, Fortnite, Minecraft, GTA, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy IMG BXM-8-256 or Mali-G76 3EEMC4.
IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 900 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 4 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 296060 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 8159 | | | | | GFloPS | 256 GFloPS | 279 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 516 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 5.45 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
