 |
Samsung Xclipse 920 at 500 MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic at 3000 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 05-06-2022
Detailed compare data of Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Vellamo, AnTuTu 8, Quadrant, Geekbench 5, Neocore, 3DMark, PCMark, GFXBench, PassMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, PUBG, Call of Duty, GTA, Fortnite, Madout2, Asphalt 9 etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Samsung Xclipse 920 or Apple A14 Bionic.
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz |
Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz |
| Frequency | 500 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 4 | | Shaders | 192 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu 8 | 947568 | 594446 | | GeekBench 5.2 | 39765 | 20131 | | GFloPS | 2124 GFloPS | 1480 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1800 MT/s | 640 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GP/s | 16 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
