 |
Apple A14 Bionic at 3000 MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 09-01-2021
Detailed compare data of Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as 3DMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark, Neocore, PassMark, Quadrant, and how good the GPU are in games GTA, Call of Duty, PUBG, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Madout2 etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Apple A14 Bionic or Mali-G77 MC9.
Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz |
Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 3000 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 9 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 594446 | 537882 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 20131 | 12878 | | | | | GFloPS | 1480 GFloPS | 504 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 640 MT/s | 1246 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 46 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
