 |
Mali-G57 MC3 at 650 MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic at 3000 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 10-01-2021
Full comparison data of Mali-G57 MC3 @ 650MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Neocore, 3DMark, PassMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Fortnite, Minecraft, GTA, Madout2, PUBG, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Mali-G57 MC3 or Apple A14 Bionic.
Mali-G57 MC3 @ 650MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G57 MC3 @ 650MHz |
Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz |
| Frequency | 650 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 3 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 16 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 320761 | 594446 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 7230 | 20131 | | | | | GFloPS | 512 GFloPS | 1480 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 398 MT/s | 640 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 6.4 GP/s | 16 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G57 MC3 @ 650MHz is better: 0
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz is better: 9
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
