 |
IMG BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Mali-G615 at 700 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-06-2023
Comprehensive comparison data of IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G615 @ 700MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, Neocore, PassMark, Vellamo, PCMark, and how good the GPU are in games Asphalt 9, Madout2, Minecraft, GTA, PUBG, Call of Duty, Fortnite etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy IMG BXM-8-256 or Mali-G615.
IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G615 @ 700MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Mali-G615 @ 700MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 700 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 6 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 608459 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 22456 | | | | | GFloPS | 256 GFloPS | 1064 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 2408 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 84 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Mali-G615 @ 700MHz is better: 6
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
