 |
IMG BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Mali-G57 MC2 at 950 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-06-2023
Detailed comparison data of IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G57 MC2 @ 950MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, GFXBench, PassMark, Neocore, PCMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of GPUs in GTA, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Madout2, PUBG, Call of Duty etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy IMG BXM-8-256 or Mali-G57 MC2.
IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G57 MC2 @ 950MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Mali-G57 MC2 @ 950MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 950 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 2 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 308465 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 0 | | | | | GFloPS | 256 GFloPS | 486 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 368 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 6.1 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Mali-G57 MC2 @ 950MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
