 |
Mali-G68 MC4 at 800 MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic at 3000 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 27-08-2021
Detailed compare data of Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Quadrant, Vellamo, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, 3DMark, Neocore, PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, and how good the GPU are in games Madout2, Fortnite, Minecraft, GTA, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Mali-G68 MC4 or Apple A14 Bionic.
Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz |
Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Shaders | 128 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 509737 | 594446 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 12756 | 20131 | | | | | GFloPS | 686 GFloPS | 1480 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 320 MT/s | 640 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 12 GP/s | 16 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz is better: 6
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
