 |
IMG BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Mali-G78AE at 700 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-06-2023
Extreme benchmark examination data of IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as PCMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu v10, 9, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, 3DMark, Neocore, PassMark, and how good the GPU are in games GTA, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Fortnite, PUBG, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy IMG BXM-8-256 or Mali-G78AE.
IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 700 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 24 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 732270 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 19040 | | | | | GFloPS | 256 GFloPS | 1158.77 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 2652 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 92.62 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz is better: 6
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
