 |
Mali-G57 MP4 at 600 MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic at 3000 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 10-01-2021
Detailed compare data of Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like 3DMark, Vellamo, Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, PCMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, Madout2, PUBG, Call of Duty, GTA, Fortnite, Asphalt 9 etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Mali-G57 MP4 or Apple A14 Bionic.
Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz |
Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz |
| Frequency | 600 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 16 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 346612 | 594446 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 8203 | 20131 | | | | | GFloPS | 498 GFloPS | 1480 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 386 MT/s | 640 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 6.4 GP/s | 16 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz is better: 0
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz is better: 8
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
