|
IMG BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-06-2023 Extreme benchmark testing data of IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as PassMark, PCMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Neocore, GFXBench, Quadrant, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, Fortnite, PUBG, Madout2, GTA, Minecraft, Call of Duty etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy IMG BXM-8-256 or Mali-G76 3EEMC4.
IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz comparison
| |
|
Spec | IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz |
Frequency | 800 MHz | 800 MHz | Cores | 8 | 4 | Shaders | 256 | 0 | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 293982 | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 6841 | | | | GFloPS | 256 GFloPS | 248 GFloPS | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 459 MT/s | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 4.84 GP/s | DirectX | 12 | 11 | Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 9
The number of parameters for which Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz is better: 0
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
| |
|