 |
IMG BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Adreno 662 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-06-2023
Comprehensive comparison data of IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Adreno 662 @ 800MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Quadrant, PCMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, PassMark, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of GPUs in PUBG, Madout2, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA, Asphalt 9, Minecraft etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy IMG BXM-8-256 or Adreno 662.
IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Adreno 662 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Adreno 662 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 0 | | Shaders | 256 | 512 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 4 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 887224 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 30205 | | | | | GFloPS | 256 GFloPS | 1698.29 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 1742 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 16.91 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 1
The number of parameters for which Adreno 662 @ 800MHz is better: 7
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
