 |
IMG BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-06-2023
Maximum benchmark testing data of IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz, which GPU is better. Full comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, Neocore, Vellamo, PassMark, Quadrant, PCMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in GTA, PUBG, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy IMG BXM-8-256 or Apple A12 Bionic.
IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 4 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 432586 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 13931 | | | | | GFloPS | 256 GFloPS | 586 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 526 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 12 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 2
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
