 |
Mali-G77 MP8 at 800 MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic at 3000 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 10-01-2021
Hardcore benchmark examination data of Mali-G77 MP8 @ 800MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz, which GPU is better. Full compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Neocore, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, Quadrant, 3DMark, PassMark, PCMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, Minecraft, PUBG, GTA, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Madout2 etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G77 MP8 or Apple A14 Bionic.
Mali-G77 MP8 @ 800MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G77 MP8 @ 800MHz |
Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 410872 | 594446 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 12714 | 20131 | | | | | GFloPS | 628 GFloPS | 1480 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1486 MT/s | 640 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 52 GP/s | 16 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G77 MP8 @ 800MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz is better: 5
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
