 |
Mali-G68 MP6 at 700 MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic at 3000 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 26-01-2021
Ultimate benchmark examination data of Mali-G68 MP6 @ 700MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz, which GPU is better. Full compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, Quadrant, PassMark, Neocore, 3DMark, and how good the GPU are in games Fortnite, GTA, Minecraft, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Mali-G68 MP6 or Apple A14 Bionic.
Mali-G68 MP6 @ 700MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G68 MP6 @ 700MHz |
Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz |
| Frequency | 700 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 24 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 589642 | 594446 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 20131 | | | | | GFloPS | 684 GFloPS | 1480 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2120 MT/s | 640 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 96 GP/s | 16 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MP6 @ 700MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz is better: 5
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
