 |
IMG BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Mali-G68 MC4 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-06-2023
Ultimate benchmark examination data of IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, GFXBench, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Call of Duty, PUBG, GTA etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy IMG BXM-8-256 or Mali-G68 MC4.
IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 4 | | Shaders | 256 | 128 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 6 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 509737 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 12756 | | | | | GFloPS | 256 GFloPS | 686 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 320 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 12 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz is better: 2
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
