 |
IMG BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-06-2023
Ultimate benchmark examination data of IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz, which GPU is better. Full compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, 3DMark, PassMark, PCMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, Quadrant, Neocore, and how good the GPU are in games Madout2, PUBG, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, GTA, Call of Duty, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy IMG BXM-8-256 or Apple A12X Bionic.
IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 7 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 653237 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 18183 | | | | | GFloPS | 256 GFloPS | 1360 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 610 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 15 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
