 |
IMG BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Mali-G57 MC5 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-06-2023
Detailed comparison data of IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G57 MC5 @ 800MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as PCMark, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, Quadrant, Neocore, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Madout2, GTA, PUBG, Fortnite etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy IMG BXM-8-256 or Mali-G57 MC5.
IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G57 MC5 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Mali-G57 MC5 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 5 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 6 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 328163 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 7230 | | | | | GFloPS | 256 GFloPS | 630.15 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 490 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 7.88 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G57 MC5 @ 800MHz is better: 1
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
