 |
Apple A14 Bionic at 3000 MHz vs Mali-G76 MP18 at 950 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 09-01-2021
Maximum benchmark testing data of Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz vs Mali-G76 MP18 @ 950MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Quadrant, Neocore, Vellamo, PCMark, PassMark, GFXBench, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Fortnite, PUBG, Madout2, GTA, Call of Duty etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Apple A14 Bionic or Mali-G76 MP18.
Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz vs Mali-G76 MP18 @ 950MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz |
Mali-G76 MP18 @ 950MHz |
| Frequency | 3000 MHz | 950 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 18 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 594446 | 351261 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 20131 | 9741 | | | | | GFloPS | 1480 GFloPS | 581.14 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 640 MT/s | 1357 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 38.97 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Mali-G76 MP18 @ 950MHz is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
