 |
IMG BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-06-2023
Detailed compare data of IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Vellamo, 3DMark, PassMark, GFXBench, PCMark, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, and how good the GPU are in games PUBG, GTA, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Madout2, Fortnite etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy IMG BXM-8-256 or Mali-G77 MC9.
IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 9 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 537882 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 12878 | | | | | GFloPS | 256 GFloPS | 504 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 1246 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 46 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz is better: 5
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
