 |
Immortalis-G715 MC16 at 750 MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic at 3000 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 29-10-2022
Detailed compare data of Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, Vellamo, PCMark, PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, Madout2, GTA, Call of Duty, Fortnite, PUBG, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Immortalis-G715 MC16 or Apple A14 Bionic.
Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz |
Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz |
| Frequency | 750 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 1268278 | 594446 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 33860 | 20131 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 1480 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2600 MT/s | 640 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 124 GP/s | 16 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
