|
IMG BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Mali-G610 MC4 at 700 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-06-2023 Full comparison data of IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G610 MC4 @ 700MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like GFXBench, 3DMark, PCMark, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, Vellamo, Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, and how good the GPU are in games Asphalt 9, Madout2, Call of Duty, Minecraft, PUBG, GTA, Fortnite etc. After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy IMG BXM-8-256 or Mali-G610 MC4.
IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G610 MC4 @ 700MHz comparison
| |
|
Spec | IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Mali-G610 MC4 @ 700MHz |
Frequency | 800 MHz | 700 MHz | Cores | 8 | 4 | Shaders | 256 | 0 | Lithography | 6 nm | 6 nm | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 671986 | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 19875 | | | | GFloPS | 256 GFloPS | 1176 GFloPS | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 2576 MT/s | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 98 GP/s | DirectX | 12 | 12 | Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Mali-G610 MC4 @ 700MHz is better: 5
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
| |
|