 |
IMG BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic at 2600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-06-2023
Full comparison data of IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like Quadrant, GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, PassMark, 3DMark, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Neocore, and how good the GPU are in games Fortnite, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Madout2, GTA etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy IMG BXM-8-256 or Apple A13 Bionic.
IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 2600 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 4 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 506152 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 17314 | | | | | GFloPS | 256 GFloPS | 786 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 560 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 13.87 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
