 |
PowerVR BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic at 3000 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 27-05-2022
Comprehensive comparison data of PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, Vellamo, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark, Neocore, PassMark, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, Asphalt 9, GTA, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Minecraft, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy PowerVR BXM-8-256 or Apple A14 Bionic.
PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 4 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 594446 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 20131 | | | | | GFloPS | 208 GFloPS | 1480 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 642 MT/s | 640 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 12 GP/s | 16 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz is better: 5
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
