 |
Mali-G78AE at 700 MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic at 3000 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 28-08-2021
Detailed compare data of Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, Vellamo, Quadrant, PCMark, 3DMark, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Fortnite, PUBG, Asphalt 9, GTA, Minecraft, Madout2, Call of Duty etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Mali-G78AE or Apple A14 Bionic.
Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz |
Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz |
| Frequency | 700 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 24 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 732270 | 594446 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19040 | 20131 | | | | | GFloPS | 1158.77 GFloPS | 1480 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2652 MT/s | 640 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 92.62 GP/s | 16 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz is better: 4
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
