 |
Adreno 662 at 800 MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic at 3000 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 21-05-2022
Hardcore benchmark testing data of Adreno 662 @ 800MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz, which GPU is better. Full comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like AnTuTu 8, 3DMark, Geekbench 5, Quadrant, Neocore, PassMark, GFXBench, PCMark, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, GTA, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Fortnite, Call of Duty, PUBG etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Adreno 662 or Apple A14 Bionic.
Adreno 662 @ 800MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Adreno 662 @ 800MHz |
Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 4 | | Shaders | 512 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu 8 | 887224 | 594446 | | GeekBench 5.2 | 30205 | 20131 | | GFloPS | 1698.29 GFloPS | 1480 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1742 MT/s | 640 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 16.91 GP/s | 16 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Adreno 662 @ 800MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
