 |
Mali-G68 MP2 at 950 MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic at 3000 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 08-03-2023
Detailed compare data of Mali-G68 MP2 @ 950MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, Vellamo, 3DMark, PassMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in PUBG, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Minecraft, GTA, Madout2, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G68 MP2 or Apple A14 Bionic.
Mali-G68 MP2 @ 950MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G68 MP2 @ 950MHz |
Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz |
| Frequency | 950 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 2 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 398642 | 594446 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 20131 | | | | | GFloPS | 928 GFloPS | 1480 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2876 MT/s | 640 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 132 GP/s | 16 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MP2 @ 950MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz is better: 6
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
