 |
Mali-G615 at 700 MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic at 3000 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 30-10-2022
Extreme benchmark examination data of Mali-G615 @ 700MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, Vellamo, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, 3DMark, Quadrant, and how good the GPU are in games Fortnite, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Madout2, Minecraft, Call of Duty, GTA etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Mali-G615 or Apple A14 Bionic.
Mali-G615 @ 700MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G615 @ 700MHz |
Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz |
| Frequency | 700 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 608459 | 594446 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 22456 | 20131 | | | | | GFloPS | 1064 GFloPS | 1480 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2408 MT/s | 640 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 84 GP/s | 16 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G615 @ 700MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
