 |
Apple A14 Bionic at 3000 MHz vs Mali-G57 MP5 at 850 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 09-01-2021
Detailed comparison data of Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz vs Mali-G57 MP5 @ 850MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, Neocore, Quadrant, PassMark, PCMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, GTA, PUBG, Minecraft, Fortnite, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A14 Bionic or Mali-G57 MP5.
Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz vs Mali-G57 MP5 @ 850MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz |
Mali-G57 MP5 @ 850MHz |
| Frequency | 3000 MHz | 850 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 5 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 594446 | 435496 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 20131 | 10212 | | | | | GFloPS | 1480 GFloPS | 705.5 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 640 MT/s | 547 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 9.07 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Mali-G57 MP5 @ 850MHz is better: 1
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
