 |
IMG BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Mali-G68 MP2 at 950 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-06-2023
Ultimate benchmark examination data of IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G68 MP2 @ 950MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, PassMark, PCMark, 3DMark, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, Call of Duty, Madout2, PUBG, GTA, Fortnite, Asphalt 9 etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy IMG BXM-8-256 or Mali-G68 MP2.
IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G68 MP2 @ 950MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Mali-G68 MP2 @ 950MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 950 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 2 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 398642 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 0 | | | | | GFloPS | 256 GFloPS | 928 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 2876 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 132 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MP2 @ 950MHz is better: 5
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
