 |
Mali-G610 MC3 at 600 MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic at 3000 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 27-05-2022
Full comparison data of Mali-G610 MC3 @ 600MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as Quadrant, GFXBench, PCMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, PassMark, Vellamo, Neocore, and how good the GPU are in games Minecraft, Asphalt 9, GTA, Call of Duty, PUBG, Madout2, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Mali-G610 MC3 or Apple A14 Bionic.
Mali-G610 MC3 @ 600MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G610 MC3 @ 600MHz |
Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz |
| Frequency | 600 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 3 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 586434 | 594446 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19875 | 20131 | | | | | GFloPS | 1008 GFloPS | 1480 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2208 MT/s | 640 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 84 GP/s | 16 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G610 MC3 @ 600MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz is better: 5
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
