|
IMG BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Mali-G715 MP9 at 750 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-06-2023 Ultimate benchmark examination data of IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like GFXBench, Quadrant, PCMark, 3DMark, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, Madout2, Fortnite, PUBG, GTA, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9 etc. After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy IMG BXM-8-256 or Mali-G715 MP9.
IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz comparison
| |
|
Spec | IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz |
Frequency | 800 MHz | 750 MHz | Cores | 8 | 9 | Shaders | 256 | 0 | Lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 797642 | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 22356 | | | | GFloPS | 256 GFloPS | 1354.62 GFloPS | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 3055 MT/s | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 106.15 GP/s | DirectX | 12 | 11 | Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz is better: 7
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
| |
|