 |
IMG BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-06-2023
Maximum benchmark examination data of IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz, which GPU is better. Full comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like GFXBench, 3DMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, PassMark, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Neocore, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, GTA, Madout2, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Call of Duty etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy IMG BXM-8-256 or Apple A12Z Bionic.
IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 715112 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 27526 | | | | | GFloPS | 256 GFloPS | 1486 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 704 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 18 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 6
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
