|
IMG BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Mali-G52 MP2 at 850 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-06-2023 Comprehensive comparison data of IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G52 MP2 @ 850MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as GFXBench, PCMark, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, 3DMark, Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Call of Duty, Minecraft, GTA, Madout2, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, PUBG etc. After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy IMG BXM-8-256 or Mali-G52 MP2.
IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G52 MP2 @ 850MHz comparison
| |
|
Spec | IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Mali-G52 MP2 @ 850MHz |
Frequency | 800 MHz | 850 MHz | Cores | 8 | 2 | Shaders | 256 | 0 | Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 218198 | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 21749 | | | | GFloPS | 256 GFloPS | 418.78 GFloPS | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 671 MT/s | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 9.41 GP/s | DirectX | 12 | 12 | Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 MP2 @ 850MHz is better: 4
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
| |
|