 |
IMG BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Apple A11 Bionic at 2400 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-06-2023
Extreme benchmark examination data of IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as PassMark, Neocore, PCMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, and how good the GPU are in games GTA, PUBG, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Madout2, Fortnite, Asphalt 9 etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy IMG BXM-8-256 or Apple A11 Bionic.
IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 2400 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 6 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 10 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 317965 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 13931 | | | | | GFloPS | 256 GFloPS | 396 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 486 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 10.8 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
