 |
IMG BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Mali-G68 MP5 at 950 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-06-2023
Comprehensive compare data of IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Quadrant, AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, GFXBench, PCMark, 3DMark, Neocore, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Fortnite, PUBG, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, GTA, Call of Duty, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy IMG BXM-8-256 or Mali-G68 MP5.
IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 950 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 5 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 610701 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 0 | | | | | GFloPS | 256 GFloPS | 1026 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 304 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 148 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz is better: 5
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
