 |
Mali-G615 MC2 at 1100 MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic at 3000 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 29-10-2024
Comprehensive comparison data of Mali-G615 MC2 @ 1100MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Antutu v10, 9, Quadrant, Vellamo, 3DMark, Geekbench 6, PCMark, Neocore, PassMark, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, Asphalt 9, GTA, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Minecraft, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Mali-G615 MC2 or Apple A14 Bionic.
Mali-G615 MC2 @ 1100MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G615 MC2 @ 1100MHz |
Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz |
| Frequency | 1100 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 709246 | 594446 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 256540 | 20131 | | | | | GFloPS | 1856 GFloPS | 1480 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 3956 MT/s | 640 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 165 GP/s | 16 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G615 MC2 @ 1100MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz is better: 2
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
