 |
IMG BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Apple A15 Bionic GPU at 3232 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-06-2023
Comprehensive comparison data of IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, PassMark, GFXBench, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, Madout2, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, GTA, Fortnite etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy IMG BXM-8-256 or Apple A15 Bionic GPU.
IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 3232 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 5 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 4 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 841256 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 41258 | | | | | GFloPS | 256 GFloPS | 2989.13 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 1233 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 39.23 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz is better: 7
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
