 |
IMG BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Mali-G710 MP16 at 650 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-06-2023
Maximum benchmark testing data of IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like 3DMark, PCMark, GFXBench, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, and how good the GPU are in games Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, GTA, Call of Duty, Madout2, PUBG etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy IMG BXM-8-256 or Mali-G710 MP16.
IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 650 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 16 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 738743 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 20145 | | | | | GFloPS | 256 GFloPS | 1174 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 2648 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 16 GP/s | 92 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz is better: 7
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
