 |
Mali-G710 MP16 at 650 MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic at 3000 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 28-08-2021
Full comparison data of Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like PCMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, PassMark, Vellamo, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, and how good the GPU are in games Madout2, GTA, PUBG, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Fortnite, Asphalt 9 etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G710 MP16 or Apple A14 Bionic.
Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz vs Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz |
Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz |
| Frequency | 650 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 738743 | 594446 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 20145 | 20131 | | | | | GFloPS | 1174 GFloPS | 1480 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2648 MT/s | 640 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 92 GP/s | 16 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic @ 3000MHz is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
