 |
Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic at 2600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022
Full comparison data of Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as GFXBench, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark, Quadrant, PassMark, Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Fortnite, PUBG, Madout2, Call of Duty, GTA etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Apple A16 Bionic or Apple A13 Bionic.
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz |
| Frequency | 3460 MHz | 2600 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 994865 | 506152 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 17314 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 786 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1320 MT/s | 560 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 42 GP/s | 13.87 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz is better: 0
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
