 |
Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz vs Mali-G78 MP24 at 650 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022
Extreme benchmark testing data of Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G78 MP24 @ 650MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as PCMark, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, PassMark, Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, PUBG, GTA, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Minecraft etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A16 Bionic or Mali-G78 MP24.
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G78 MP24 @ 650MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
Mali-G78 MP24 @ 650MHz |
| Frequency | 3460 MHz | 650 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 24 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 994865 | 726680 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 19040 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 1076 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1320 MT/s | 2463 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 42 GP/s | 86 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G78 MP24 @ 650MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
