 |
Mali-G78AE at 700 MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic at 2600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 28-08-2021
Comprehensive compare data of Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like GFXBench, Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, Quadrant, PassMark, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Madout2, PUBG, GTA, Call of Duty, Minecraft etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G78AE or Apple A13 Bionic.
Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz |
Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz |
| Frequency | 700 MHz | 2600 MHz | | Cores | 24 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 732270 | 506152 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19040 | 17314 | | | | | GFloPS | 1158.77 GFloPS | 786 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2652 MT/s | 560 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 92.62 GP/s | 13.87 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
