 |
Mali-G715 MP9 at 750 MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 30-10-2022
Maximum benchmark examination data of Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, GFXBench, 3DMark, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, Quadrant, and how good the GPU are in games Minecraft, Madout2, Asphalt 9, GTA, Fortnite, PUBG, Call of Duty etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Mali-G715 MP9 or Apple A16 Bionic.
Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz |
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
| Frequency | 750 MHz | 3460 MHz | | Cores | 9 | 5 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm | | Antutu v10 | 797642 | 994865 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 22356 | 41258 | | | | | GFloPS | 1354.62 GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 3055 MT/s | 1320 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 106.15 GP/s | 42 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 6
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
