 |
Mali-G615 at 700 MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic at 2600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 30-10-2022
Extreme benchmark testing data of Mali-G615 @ 700MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz, which GPU is better. Full compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Vellamo, PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Call of Duty, Madout2, Fortnite, GTA, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Mali-G615 or Apple A13 Bionic.
Mali-G615 @ 700MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G615 @ 700MHz |
Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz |
| Frequency | 700 MHz | 2600 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 608459 | 506152 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 22456 | 17314 | | | | | GFloPS | 1064 GFloPS | 786 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2408 MT/s | 560 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 84 GP/s | 13.87 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G615 @ 700MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
